[03:44] *** salmon_ has joined #kamaelia

[04:29] *** Lawouach_ has joined #kamaelia

[06:03] *** Uraeus has joined #kamaelia

[06:05] *** MS- has joined #kamaelia

[06:05] < MS-> Morning

[06:22] < Lawouach_> morning mate

[07:07] < MS-> Pondering this suggestion by Matt: http://code.google.com/p/kamaelia/source/detail?r=6149

[07:26] < Lawouach_> Doesn't feel right

[07:27] < Lawouach_> that being said, erlang has a bit of the same issue where many erlang developers prefer passing specific messages to notify an error rather than use exceptions

[07:32] *** Uraeus has joined #kamaelia

[07:36] *** salmon_ has joined #kamaelia

[07:37] *** MS- nods

[07:37] < MS-> I think I prefer the idea of the equivalent of a SIGPIPE message

[07:37] < MS-> when a component dies inside a pipeline

[07:38] < MS-> resulting in the pipeline actively choosing to shutdown its children

[07:39] *** salmon_1 has joined #kamaelia

[07:39] *** salmon_2 has joined #kamaelia

[07:41] *** salmon_2 is now known as salmon_

[14:22] *** salmon_ has joined #kamaelia

[14:46] *** salmon_ has joined #kamaelia

[15:49] *** eikenberry has joined #kamaelia

[16:07] *** vmlemon_ has joined #kamaelia

[16:12] < vmlemon_> Hi

[17:58] *** eikenberry_ has joined #kamaelia

[18:17] *** eikenberry_ is now known as eikenberry

[18:45] *** eikenberry_ has joined #kamaelia

[19:18] *** salmon_ has joined #kamaelia

[22:57] *** eikenberry_ is now known as eikenberry